What a thoughtful reflection. Thank you for sharing it.
That line on p. 20 stopped me too! I highlighted it. It’s such a simple idea, but it asks a lot of us. If we want students to have voice, choice, and time to make sense of things together, teachers need that same experience. Otherwise we’re asking them to create something they’ve never felt.
I love your BTC story. You didn’t mandate anything. You offered something worth learning, and people showed up. Then the relationship opened the door to planning and co-teaching. That’s the whole arc right there. Buy-in didn’t come first. It grew out of a good experience. I had a similar experience when I was coaching last year in a different district. I offered PD on BTC, then was asked by some sites to please come do site PD, which then grew into working with teams. I loved collaborating with teachers as we all worked together to better our practice.
Your questions are the right ones. How do we find the time? How do we get teachers to want this? How do we start? I don’t think the answer is asking teachers to give up more prep. I wonder if it starts smaller. Could one PLC a month become a mini learning lab? Could a small group of willing teachers try it first and share what they noticed? Sometimes the best “rollout” is a few colleagues saying, “You have to try this.”
The p. 38 piece on new norms feels important here too. If a lab feels like an evaluation, nobody will want to go first. If it feels like shared curiosity about student thinking, that changes everything.
I’m so glad you have colleagues in this study with you. That’s a built-in team to start dreaming with. What’s one small step your group could try this semester?
I’d love for you to bring this to our live session on Chapter 4 on 11/17. I think a lot of folks are wrestling with the same “how.” You've got some great insights and reflections, and we all love to learn together.